Compare and contrast the treatments of dogs in “To Flush, My Dog” by Elizabeth Barrett Browning and RSPCA leaflet

The poem To ebullition, My Dog by Elizabeth Barrett browning and the leaflet of RSPCA are deuce writings exploring the same theme quest after and the treatments by their owners. Elizabeth elaborates her relationship with her dog while the RSPCA register articulates the problems facing slightly unfortunate dogs. The happening expressed and the apply of spoken communication devices shares some similarities albeit sensation is a poem and the other comprise articles from an animal caring organization. Similarities, differences and consequence of them will be discussed in this essay.The poem is clearly a panegyric of the writers beloved dog while the RSPCA documents aim to cost for donation. The poem is made of 20 stanzas of 6 lines each and fastly portraits a rattling dear and noble aura to share her love for the dog. The RSPCA document adopts a candid manner in the form of writing a letter to the prospective donors supplemented by two touching stories. The three articles contentiously exploit to gain sympathy from the readers. With this underlying aim, the RSPCA inspector uses alarming hard tangible body (6,982 abused animals a year) to arouse readers attention. He also uses repeated strong speech, battered, tormented and abandoned to give an awakening insight for his readers on the sincerity of the cruelty. The use of the rhetorical question Will you give me the resources I unavoidableness to fight this rising tide of cruelty? is genuinely effective.There is impacting credit line on the cares of dogs. Elizabeth treats Flush nicely and gently. As described in stanza 16, she feeds Flush sugared milk, puts pretty collar on it and pats the dog to please it. The physical affection from the owner is abundant with proper shelter, delicious food and interaction. On the contrary, Poppy and Trio, both rescued by RSPCA, are unfortunate. Both dogs are very young at 4 months and one day old respectively. by and by messing the room, Trio was grabbed an d squeezed by its owner. It was thrown across the room with full eviscerate and smashed against a cupboard. (Line 9-11) Poppy was even flushed into the lot by its owner.In RSPCA documents, it focuses on the cruel treatments of Poppy and Trio by their owners. Trio is petrified and hurt by its owner (Line 12 in Trio Story). They apply a very bad relationship. Although in that respect was food and shelter for Trio, there was no trust between them. The dog had to crawl away and fog under a cot (Line 13). Trios reaction makes us feel very sorry. In the pathetic story of Poppy, his owner doesnt want it only after one day. (Animal like these needs your oblige NOW). Readers easily notice the problem and are moved by the ocular details when the dog was found along the drainage. Simply flushes you down the toilet (line 3-4) shows that the owner didnt show any humanitarian feeling to Poppy at all. To Poppy, there was no food and proper shelter. The two stories present in good order vi sual effect by describing details of the maltreatment. It effectively strengthens the appeal for service of process the animals.On the other hand, Flush is Elizabeths best friend. It sits beside her when she is sick (Stanza 7 line 2 & 6). When Elizabeth is crying with one or two nimble tears and signing, Flush sprang in eager haste in a naked as a jaybird haste.(Stanza 11) It gives Elizabeth love by being tender and affectionate. These lines touch the mutual love between Flush and its owner. It delivers an authentic illustration of a dogs human nature.This nature is shared by the RSPCAs volunteers who give the dogs warm and comfortable shelters with loving care around the clock. wedded care round the clock pulled Poppy back from brink (line 15-16). They resemble Elizabeths kindness to animals.The terminology devices of the two documents share similarities and differences. Both documents use emotional languages and repetition for effect. In RSPCA leaflet, words like struggle, death, and tender, pathetic and devoted are used. The repetition suggests the writers sympathy towards these dogs and dramatizes the effect. The readers will be sorry and start thinking some animals maltreatments. In the poem about Flush, words like benediction, wishing weal, supportive are used. This gives effect of how important of the dog to Elizabeth. The word benediction reiterates that its owner regards it as a gift from god.The differences in language of the two are the use of metaphors and beginning rhyme. In stanza 2 of Flush poem, silver-suited is used to describe the appearance of Flush. This alliteration decides the color of the fur as very appealing and gorgeous-looking. It also suggests the inability of the fur and the joy and comfort it gives Elizabeth. In stanza 11, fawning, fondling is another specimen of alliteration which is used to describe when the writer is sad, Flush tries to please her. The language devices powerfully symbolize how affectionate and tender Flush is. The leaflet of RSPCA do not use much alliteration and metaphors.The structures of two passages are very different. The RSPCA leaflet is in passage form and language is quite informal. irrelevant the poem, there are no create verbally words and use of ancient words. The free style writing allows the writers to convey its main messages to the reader much easily. The Flush poem on the other hand, has frequent use of rhyming words and also archaic words thee to make the poem more poetic. Examples are plenty throughout the entire poem, like one, run and nature, shaft in stanza 1 and height, delight, line and thine in the last stanza The rhyming words create a musical effect which attracts readers attention.Although the two documents look at the theme of treatments of dogs in different perspectives, both successfully achieve their goals in a high literary standard. Structures and the use of language features share some similarities and yet there are differences. They adop t pictorial ways of articulating their ideas, and effectively induce empathy and sympathy from their readers. We can deeply feel admiration to the poem protagonist Flush and also arouse kindness to the miserable tortured animals in the RSPCA leaflet.