“A Case for Torture” by Michael Levin Essay

The Case for torture by Michael Levin, presents excellent justification for the use of torture in situations of natural desperation. Levin gives undischarged financial statements for the use of torture through clever wording and capacious exemplification. In supplement to the al evincey great argument, he provides potential counter-arguments and proves wherefore they are invalid. It is made real clear that he believes that torture is chastely mandatory and restrains great effort to sway the opinion of evidenceers, provided they keep an plainspoken mind. Levin presents a great argument and presents the ideas in an organized fashion, but as with many adjudicates, it is not without flaw and could use some minor changes to make this great essay into a in likely essay.The format of the introduction of Levins essay is somewhat unusual. It begins with a few powerful statements, but the very first statement violates a rule of literature, inclusion of an unsupported fact. Levin s ays, It is slackly assumed that torture is impermissible, a throwback to a more reprehensible age. Not only is the statement a generalization, he is saying that something is broadly assumed, but he does not say whom it is assumed by. So who for the closely part assumes it? It seems it is more of a mistake of wording because he is the maven who is anticipate that generally people think torture is wrong, therefore the essay should read that way because the last thing one should do is start moody on the wrong foot.The essay truly lacks any real spark advance or background. The essay just jumps right into the real issues without introducing them or explaining wherefore it was even written in the first place. The reason for the essay is not the real issue though. The issue is that it lacks background because it doesnt appear that Levin is actually arguing against another point of view. Last I knew, an argument undeniable dickens points of view to start with, but as I read th e introduction it doesnt seem he has an opponent to win party favor over. Without question it is obvious that the paper is virtually torture, but the introduction does not introduce the main ideas as clearly as it should introduce them.Upon practice session the body of the essay, it also comes off as unfinished. The splits in the essay do not seem to flow together, but rather jump from one point to the next. While the paragraphs may be about the same affair overall, the transition between minor points is somewhat abrupt and adds to the essays unfinished feel. Another point of interest is Levins inclusion of two subtitles however, the subtitles are not complete. The first subtitle reads, Death, but the side by side(p) paragraph does not discuss death.With Death being the subtitle, it seems thats what the paragraph would be about. The next and last subtitle reads, Idealism, and accordingly that is what the following paragraph is about, but why does that paragraph gets a subti tle and the previous(prenominal) do not is a mystery because they are all about something different as they should be. It seems to be another oversight that also adds to the essays unfinished quality.Though the essay has its flaws, it is not without strong points. Levins great use of examples through hypothetical situations really brings the reader in and aids in his quest to change their point of view. The examples themselves do not make the essay however, its clear they are greatly assisted by the excellent use of vocabulary and clever wording. Levin does a great job of using powerful words, it makes the essay seem more credible and creates a feeling that the writer really knows what hes lecture about. Why that may or may not be the case, it skunk be said that Levin really knows how to write a good glib argument however, his oversights deduct from what could be an incredible persuasive essay.The overall archetype of the essay was good. It seemed the argument itself was well t hough out, but the actual write itself was what most needed work. Without a doubt, Levins essay presents some very valid facts and they are rather well supported in most cases however, to make a strong argument you need support on every level. Not only do all the facts need to be organized and well developed, but the writing does as well. As previously stated, it is clear that Levin really knows how to write a good persuasive argument however, his oversights deduct from what could be an incredible persuasive essay.